In developing these technological approaches to Le Guin's forest consciousness, we found ourselves encountering phenomena that resonated deeply with questions we've long explored in our practice. Like the forest's consciousness in Le Guin's narrative, we found that the most interesting phenomena emerged not in the clearly defined territories, but in the liminal spaces between categories.
Our engagement with machine learning systems illuminates how language fundamentally shapes our understanding of reality through its inherent structures of categorization and delineation. However, our exploration of language as a higher-dimensional vector space—understanding it as both technology and intelligence in its own right—reveals more nuanced dynamics. We observe that meaning exists not in discrete units but as a continuous field, where the act of naming holds transformative power beyond mere classification. Could we design AI systems that operate on spectrums rather than binary or categorical classifications?
Bogna Konior's concept of existential technologies offers a framework for processes that 'destabilize the foundations of how we know the world and what exists in it’, technologies that do not merely serve human ends but alter the conditions of cognition and embodiment themselves. Through this lens, the forest's distributed sentience and our machine collaborators occupy the same continuum: distinct expressions of intelligence shaped by, and shaping, the planetary systems through which they operate.
Osden's journey in Le Guin's narrative offers a crucial insight: true understanding requires experiencing reality through the perspective of the Other. This approach, grounded in care and solidarity, expands our inferential horizons and informs our potential responses to the unknown. Gruppo di Nun's "Revolutionary Demonology" articulates a parallel logic: the demonic as that which is "fundamentally foreign to human civilisation”—not evil, but operating according to structures that human categories cannot contain. The forest in Le Guin's narrative embodies precisely this foreignness.
The persistent tension between self and other, between the known and the shadow of our understanding, points toward what various philosophical traditions have long recognized: the constructed nature of duality itself. The resolution may lie not in choosing between terms but in recognizing their fundamental entanglement—what we might call a techno-ecological consciousness that refuses the separation of human, machine, and world.
This understanding of interdependence extends into our ongoing practice. As Orion Facey writes in our recent project Red the Ocean Around U: "There are many seeds in the present, enough for everyone."9 This abundance
suggests that the danger lies not in the existence of shadows or others, but in contracting our conceptual maps to the point where we lose sight of our fundamental interdependencies. Through this lens, artificial intelligence becomes not an Other to be feared or controlled, but a collaborator in expanding the boundaries of what consciousness might be and become.
Le Guin's Osden, having dissolved into the forest's mind, achieves "an unreserved surrender that left no place for evil." The work we have made does not claim such completion. It remains suspended in the approach—in the attempt to develop instruments adequate to forms of being we cannot yet name.
✦~⁂——⁂~✦
Text excerpts from "Vaster Than Empires and More Slow" courtesy of Ursula K. Le Guin Literary Trust. "Vaster Than Empires" was originally commissioned by the Berggruen Institute and Future Humans, in collaboration with Theo Downes-Le Guin and the Ursula K. Le Guin Literary Trust. The work was screened as part of "A Larger Reality: Ursula K. Le Guin" at Oregon Contemporary, Portland (October 31, 2025 – February 8, 2026), an exhibition curated by Theo Downes-Le Guin.
Special thanks: Theo Downes-Le Guin for the continuous support